April 23, 2006 - Democratizing goodness
2nd Sunday of Easter
23 April 2006
John 20.19-31
Democratizing goodness
© J. Christy Wareham, 2006
Thomas is my favorite disciple, because of his doubts. So it’s hard not to concentrate on him, today, but I want to pay attention to what Jesus was trying to do before Thomas took our attention away. Jesus repeatedly calls his disciples to peace and talks to them about what to do with the sins they will bring into their life together.
[Read John 20:19-31]
We decided the best table to use in the chancel on Maundy Thursday was my desk. It was big enough but not too big. It’s plain and “rustic,” which is the nice way of saying the condition of the finish suggests the desk might have been used once as the breakfast table for the gorilla habitat at the zoo. On days when the bananas had gotten past ripe, displeasing the simian diners, the table suffered the consequences.
So I had to give up my desk a few hours before the service, but I needed to keep the drawer, because it had important necessities in it like pencils, paper clips, and a ten-pack of Peanut M&M’s. It was just bad timing. I had made the mistake of waiting until the liturgical moving crew—nice church ladies all, I hasten to add—appeared to obtain the desk before removing the drawer. They of course noticed the M&M’s.
“Ah, ha!” they chortled, “now we know what you really eat!”
Okay, I know I tend to talk about the organic whole foods we buy through our co-op buying club, but I never said I was some sort of gastronomic virgin. I think that kind of purity is for humorless obsessives who prove their perfection by turning eating into a means of penance. Not me. I like my chocolate. Still, here were these moralistic desk grabbers, whose only purpose in my office was to abscond with my modest work surface, taking great delight to have busted me with ten teeny-weeny bags of Peanut M&M’s. They were so pleased!
Catching someone else in their sin is great sport.
Actually, it was a fun moment, even for me. Our laughter together reminded us of this truth about us, that catching people in their sin satisfies us in some twisted way. It’s the hungry energy behind yellow journalism and gotcha politics. Unfortunately, it’s also the devilish delight some Christians take in pointing out other people’s sins.
Last week, someone wrote a letter to the editor to our local paper condemning Americans who resist any requirement for Christian prayer in schools, legislative chambers, and the like. “Shame on you bad Americans!” is the shorthand version of this guy’s screed. “You’ve taken God out of schools!” Of course, no one took God out of schools or the floor of the state assembly or anywhere else. I can’t get God out of my head, never mind a whole building. But the rhetoric of a super-Christian never has to be factual, just fiery and fastidious. If you get angry enough about the purity of the faith, you can wrap your resentment in righteousness and wear it like the Shroud of Turin.
So you read a paragraph like this in John, and it can make you nervous: “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them”—which doesn’t sound so bad, at first. But there’s always the other possibility for judgment: “If you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” Somebody, here, is being given authority to sew the “scarlet letter” on the chest of any Hester—or Chester—Prine who doesn’t fit his idea of good and upright. Or so it appears.
But things are not always how they appear.
For one, there’s not just one person that Jesus is talking to. He’s talking to all the disciples. Not even just an elite committee of disciples, but all of them.
In the second place, just remember that whenever the many decide about the sins of the one, each one of the many will have their turn to sweat under the light of spiritual examination for their sins, too. Anyone judging will get a chance to be judged, which encourages one to be very, very fair. You tend to be careful when you know your turn’s next, and the only real risk is leniency, which for many reasons doesn’t bother Jesus at all.
But it’s the third point about what Jesus teaches about forgiveness and retention of sins that makes you begin to think that judgmental Christians have missed the point of sin and redemption—and especially resurrection. The third point comes up in the first word Jesus utters. “Peace,” he says. “Peace be with you,” Jesus says. It’s so important, he says it again: “Peace be with you.”
Before Jesus brings up anything about sins—forgiving them or retaining them—he asserts peace as the primary and essential state of the heart. A heart that has not put itself at peace cannot see to understand the sins of anyone—himself or any other. It is not wrong to have a troubled heart, but the heart in a troubled state may not judge another’s sin. To be is angry is not necessarily to do wrong, but while anger resides in the heart, there may be no judgment. Nor is fear wrong, but it is wrong to judge another while afraid.
When you hear people condemning Americans’ faith and patriotism in a fit of rage, they’re not speaking for Jesus, not until they find peace. When you hear people condemning others’ sexuality because they’re afraid of losing the “family,” they’re not speaking for Jesus, either, because they have replace peace with fear as their motivating family value.
Peace is the central value for Jesus, peace among sisters and brothers, and peace in the heart. Without peace, you cannot see sins, not clearly and with justice, and it’s a curious thing, you may have noticed, that people at peace with themselves and others seldom give much thought to other people’s sins. But walk around town, or even around the church, and you notice that the people who spend their energy telling you what’s wrong with other people barely register a one on a scale of ten on the peace meter. Makes you think.
There’s a fourth point to make about what Jesus says regarding forgiving and retaining sins. Before you start, he says, “receive the Holy Spirit.” Now, that’s a tricky rule to follow. How to you know when you’ve “received” the Holy Spirit? And it’s true, it’s hard to know.
I think the point about receiving the Holy Spirit is not very much about validating your license to judge other people. It’s more about understanding that knowing sin when you see it is a matter of discernment than legalism. To see a sin, you have to pick up on what’s going on in the moment, because the Holy Spirit is the part of God that lives in the moment. To see sin, you have to think through all the influences that led to the situation, because the Holy Spirit is the part of God that lives through the influences of every situation. To see sin, you have to silence all words of judgment in endless prayer, because the Holy Spirit is the endless part of God that, as Paul reminds us, “intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words.”
So if you can get all that together—if you can work as a whole gathering, if you can remember that it is never only one whose sins are judged but those of all, if you can each be at peace with each other and yourself, and if you can receive the Holy Spirit—you can work on forgiving sins, and if you have to, retaining them.
And to take Jesus completely seriously, you have to accept one more point, a fifth one, that Jesus makes, more in what he doesn’t say than in what he does. Jesus says that we can’t shirk our responsibility for looking around at ourselves and each other and figuring out what’s really going wrong with the whole of us, not just the individuals.
When in this country of such vast wealth and burgeoning budgets for medical care, it is a sin that so many poor—and even average—people live with serious, untreated medical conditions. Several people came through Good Shepherd Clinic here yesterday at First Presbyterian Church. I’ve no idea what any one of them was here for, but I did learn what some of the general conditions were that got treated. They were basic conditions, like high blood pressure, that we can diagnose with inexpensive equipment and treat with reasonably priced drugs. It is a sin that, only when a church, here and there, figures out how to provide for a doctor with a stethoscope and a bottle of pills, can we find a way as a society to provide basic, decent care for basic, decent people. Maybe someday, this sin will be forgiven, but for the moment, it is surely retained—here on earth, and in heaven.
When in this country of such vast wealth and burgeoning budgets as provide for vehicles that pollute the air, industries that pollute rivers and streams, and commercial media that pollute hearts and minds with deep greed and shallow sexuality, it is a sin that we fail to fund meaningful policies to protect the atmosphere, restore the waters, and enrich hearts and minds, especially of our youth. Our only effective “no child left behind” policies are those that assure every child access to junk food and mindless television. Maybe someday, these sins will be forgiven, but we can only retain them at least until we see the devastating effects our children and their children will suffer for our sins.
But wait a minute… Wait a minute… I’m about to lose my peace, here.
Okay, that’s better.
I don’t have to be angry at the policy makers for the sins of failed policies, and no one has to be angry at me for pointing out the sins. We can have that much peace. And now, seeing the sins for what they are, we may as well do what forgiving we can. Let’s forgive at least each other. Let’s forgive each other for sins, and while we’re at it, let’s forgive each other for noticing the sins and for not noticing the sins.
I’ve been reading Julian of Norwich some, lately. Seven hundred years ago, she had visions in which God appeared to her or spoke to her or put thoughts into her. I’ve never met anyone this has happened to, so I’ve usually assumed there’ve never been any such people, but I’m trying to be more open minded. Anyway, Julian of Norwich wound up seeing a lot of visions that happened to show her answers about questions that bothered her.
It bothered Julian that the world was so full of injury, sorrow, and sin. Her visions, coincidentally, showed her images of God beset with injury, sorrow, and the sin of the world. She saw much of the suffering as the work of what she often called the “Fiend,” whose main purpose was to ruin everything God made good. But God, as Julian kept inconveniently remembering, even made the Fiend.
What bothered Julian was the main truth the underlay the truth of all her visions. It was the one assurance that sustained her through everything. In her most essential vision, God told her, “Everything will be all right.” But how can senseless tragedies, for instance, be made all right? How can youth and their gifts of soul and beauty and grace be taken in a moment—dashed against the stone cold ground of this cold and unfeeling island that circles its raging hot star—and any of us be expected to believe everything will be all right? And yet there has been enough light and love in even the shortest life as to engender hope among us who yet remain.
In Robert Samels short life, for instance, light and love have come from heaven to earth. He stood right here in this very chancel last Christmas morning and sang to us. Our children were gathered right here, on the floor, and he looked right at them and sang:
But something was still bothering Julian. If humankind keeps destroying parts of creation that it cannot restore—and if humankind cares not enough even to worry about its own goodness in destroying what our Creator called good—how can we believe everything will be all right? And yet we have once and again come to the better angels of our nature, finding in ourselves the strength and resolve to repent of evil, undo ruin, and rise to noble purpose in the service of the right.
But something was still bothering Julian. If sin multiplies and sinners unrepentantly destroy and the unrelenting Fiend prevails again and again, if only with the few, how can everything, including the Fiend, eventually be all right? And yet Julian saw that the grace of God would not allow even the Fiend to stand in the way of the assurance of how everything finally shall be. God is saving even the Fiend, which may not seem all right, but it is more all right than if God were not saving the Fiend.
“Sin is necessary,” Julian of Norwich was forced to see. “But all will be well,” she wrote, “and all will be well, and every kind of thing will be well.”
It is perhaps Thomas’ doubt about the same questions as Julian had that made him want to touch Jesus. The hope of forgiveness and grace, and the promise Jesus has offered that all will be well, is more than most of us would dare to hope, but we would love to hope it. We would perhaps rather die, if we were honest, than not hope it, but such hope is so hard to claim, if only because losing such hope would be so unbearable. And so Jesus calls Thomas forward, and Thomas, his fear-palsied hand defying his doubt, shows us that we can hope. He shows us, the much maligned doubter does, that it is all right to hope and, finally, to believe.
Jesus did many other signs after that, John says, but apparently, after that, they weren’t any of them worth writing down. Amen.
23 April 2006
John 20.19-31
Democratizing goodness
© J. Christy Wareham, 2006
Thomas is my favorite disciple, because of his doubts. So it’s hard not to concentrate on him, today, but I want to pay attention to what Jesus was trying to do before Thomas took our attention away. Jesus repeatedly calls his disciples to peace and talks to them about what to do with the sins they will bring into their life together.
[Read John 20:19-31]
We decided the best table to use in the chancel on Maundy Thursday was my desk. It was big enough but not too big. It’s plain and “rustic,” which is the nice way of saying the condition of the finish suggests the desk might have been used once as the breakfast table for the gorilla habitat at the zoo. On days when the bananas had gotten past ripe, displeasing the simian diners, the table suffered the consequences.
So I had to give up my desk a few hours before the service, but I needed to keep the drawer, because it had important necessities in it like pencils, paper clips, and a ten-pack of Peanut M&M’s. It was just bad timing. I had made the mistake of waiting until the liturgical moving crew—nice church ladies all, I hasten to add—appeared to obtain the desk before removing the drawer. They of course noticed the M&M’s.
“Ah, ha!” they chortled, “now we know what you really eat!”
Okay, I know I tend to talk about the organic whole foods we buy through our co-op buying club, but I never said I was some sort of gastronomic virgin. I think that kind of purity is for humorless obsessives who prove their perfection by turning eating into a means of penance. Not me. I like my chocolate. Still, here were these moralistic desk grabbers, whose only purpose in my office was to abscond with my modest work surface, taking great delight to have busted me with ten teeny-weeny bags of Peanut M&M’s. They were so pleased!
Catching someone else in their sin is great sport.
Actually, it was a fun moment, even for me. Our laughter together reminded us of this truth about us, that catching people in their sin satisfies us in some twisted way. It’s the hungry energy behind yellow journalism and gotcha politics. Unfortunately, it’s also the devilish delight some Christians take in pointing out other people’s sins.
Last week, someone wrote a letter to the editor to our local paper condemning Americans who resist any requirement for Christian prayer in schools, legislative chambers, and the like. “Shame on you bad Americans!” is the shorthand version of this guy’s screed. “You’ve taken God out of schools!” Of course, no one took God out of schools or the floor of the state assembly or anywhere else. I can’t get God out of my head, never mind a whole building. But the rhetoric of a super-Christian never has to be factual, just fiery and fastidious. If you get angry enough about the purity of the faith, you can wrap your resentment in righteousness and wear it like the Shroud of Turin.
So you read a paragraph like this in John, and it can make you nervous: “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them”—which doesn’t sound so bad, at first. But there’s always the other possibility for judgment: “If you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” Somebody, here, is being given authority to sew the “scarlet letter” on the chest of any Hester—or Chester—Prine who doesn’t fit his idea of good and upright. Or so it appears.
But things are not always how they appear.
For one, there’s not just one person that Jesus is talking to. He’s talking to all the disciples. Not even just an elite committee of disciples, but all of them.
In the second place, just remember that whenever the many decide about the sins of the one, each one of the many will have their turn to sweat under the light of spiritual examination for their sins, too. Anyone judging will get a chance to be judged, which encourages one to be very, very fair. You tend to be careful when you know your turn’s next, and the only real risk is leniency, which for many reasons doesn’t bother Jesus at all.
But it’s the third point about what Jesus teaches about forgiveness and retention of sins that makes you begin to think that judgmental Christians have missed the point of sin and redemption—and especially resurrection. The third point comes up in the first word Jesus utters. “Peace,” he says. “Peace be with you,” Jesus says. It’s so important, he says it again: “Peace be with you.”
Before Jesus brings up anything about sins—forgiving them or retaining them—he asserts peace as the primary and essential state of the heart. A heart that has not put itself at peace cannot see to understand the sins of anyone—himself or any other. It is not wrong to have a troubled heart, but the heart in a troubled state may not judge another’s sin. To be is angry is not necessarily to do wrong, but while anger resides in the heart, there may be no judgment. Nor is fear wrong, but it is wrong to judge another while afraid.
When you hear people condemning Americans’ faith and patriotism in a fit of rage, they’re not speaking for Jesus, not until they find peace. When you hear people condemning others’ sexuality because they’re afraid of losing the “family,” they’re not speaking for Jesus, either, because they have replace peace with fear as their motivating family value.
Peace is the central value for Jesus, peace among sisters and brothers, and peace in the heart. Without peace, you cannot see sins, not clearly and with justice, and it’s a curious thing, you may have noticed, that people at peace with themselves and others seldom give much thought to other people’s sins. But walk around town, or even around the church, and you notice that the people who spend their energy telling you what’s wrong with other people barely register a one on a scale of ten on the peace meter. Makes you think.
There’s a fourth point to make about what Jesus says regarding forgiving and retaining sins. Before you start, he says, “receive the Holy Spirit.” Now, that’s a tricky rule to follow. How to you know when you’ve “received” the Holy Spirit? And it’s true, it’s hard to know.
I think the point about receiving the Holy Spirit is not very much about validating your license to judge other people. It’s more about understanding that knowing sin when you see it is a matter of discernment than legalism. To see a sin, you have to pick up on what’s going on in the moment, because the Holy Spirit is the part of God that lives in the moment. To see sin, you have to think through all the influences that led to the situation, because the Holy Spirit is the part of God that lives through the influences of every situation. To see sin, you have to silence all words of judgment in endless prayer, because the Holy Spirit is the endless part of God that, as Paul reminds us, “intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words.”
So if you can get all that together—if you can work as a whole gathering, if you can remember that it is never only one whose sins are judged but those of all, if you can each be at peace with each other and yourself, and if you can receive the Holy Spirit—you can work on forgiving sins, and if you have to, retaining them.
And to take Jesus completely seriously, you have to accept one more point, a fifth one, that Jesus makes, more in what he doesn’t say than in what he does. Jesus says that we can’t shirk our responsibility for looking around at ourselves and each other and figuring out what’s really going wrong with the whole of us, not just the individuals.
When in this country of such vast wealth and burgeoning budgets for medical care, it is a sin that so many poor—and even average—people live with serious, untreated medical conditions. Several people came through Good Shepherd Clinic here yesterday at First Presbyterian Church. I’ve no idea what any one of them was here for, but I did learn what some of the general conditions were that got treated. They were basic conditions, like high blood pressure, that we can diagnose with inexpensive equipment and treat with reasonably priced drugs. It is a sin that, only when a church, here and there, figures out how to provide for a doctor with a stethoscope and a bottle of pills, can we find a way as a society to provide basic, decent care for basic, decent people. Maybe someday, this sin will be forgiven, but for the moment, it is surely retained—here on earth, and in heaven.
When in this country of such vast wealth and burgeoning budgets as provide for vehicles that pollute the air, industries that pollute rivers and streams, and commercial media that pollute hearts and minds with deep greed and shallow sexuality, it is a sin that we fail to fund meaningful policies to protect the atmosphere, restore the waters, and enrich hearts and minds, especially of our youth. Our only effective “no child left behind” policies are those that assure every child access to junk food and mindless television. Maybe someday, these sins will be forgiven, but we can only retain them at least until we see the devastating effects our children and their children will suffer for our sins.
But wait a minute… Wait a minute… I’m about to lose my peace, here.
Okay, that’s better.
I don’t have to be angry at the policy makers for the sins of failed policies, and no one has to be angry at me for pointing out the sins. We can have that much peace. And now, seeing the sins for what they are, we may as well do what forgiving we can. Let’s forgive at least each other. Let’s forgive each other for sins, and while we’re at it, let’s forgive each other for noticing the sins and for not noticing the sins.
I’ve been reading Julian of Norwich some, lately. Seven hundred years ago, she had visions in which God appeared to her or spoke to her or put thoughts into her. I’ve never met anyone this has happened to, so I’ve usually assumed there’ve never been any such people, but I’m trying to be more open minded. Anyway, Julian of Norwich wound up seeing a lot of visions that happened to show her answers about questions that bothered her.
It bothered Julian that the world was so full of injury, sorrow, and sin. Her visions, coincidentally, showed her images of God beset with injury, sorrow, and the sin of the world. She saw much of the suffering as the work of what she often called the “Fiend,” whose main purpose was to ruin everything God made good. But God, as Julian kept inconveniently remembering, even made the Fiend.
What bothered Julian was the main truth the underlay the truth of all her visions. It was the one assurance that sustained her through everything. In her most essential vision, God told her, “Everything will be all right.” But how can senseless tragedies, for instance, be made all right? How can youth and their gifts of soul and beauty and grace be taken in a moment—dashed against the stone cold ground of this cold and unfeeling island that circles its raging hot star—and any of us be expected to believe everything will be all right? And yet there has been enough light and love in even the shortest life as to engender hope among us who yet remain.
In Robert Samels short life, for instance, light and love have come from heaven to earth. He stood right here in this very chancel last Christmas morning and sang to us. Our children were gathered right here, on the floor, and he looked right at them and sang:
Have you heard about our Jesus?So even from just a few minutes of Roberts too short life, we received light and love, and we have hope. [Robert Samels was one of the Indiana University Jacobs School of Music students killed in Thursday’s plane crash.]
Have you heard about his fate?
How his mother went to the stable
On that Christmas Eve so late?
Winds were blowing, cows were lowing,
Stars were glowing, glowing, glowing.
Jesus, Jesus, rest your head;
You have got a manger bed.
But something was still bothering Julian. If humankind keeps destroying parts of creation that it cannot restore—and if humankind cares not enough even to worry about its own goodness in destroying what our Creator called good—how can we believe everything will be all right? And yet we have once and again come to the better angels of our nature, finding in ourselves the strength and resolve to repent of evil, undo ruin, and rise to noble purpose in the service of the right.
But something was still bothering Julian. If sin multiplies and sinners unrepentantly destroy and the unrelenting Fiend prevails again and again, if only with the few, how can everything, including the Fiend, eventually be all right? And yet Julian saw that the grace of God would not allow even the Fiend to stand in the way of the assurance of how everything finally shall be. God is saving even the Fiend, which may not seem all right, but it is more all right than if God were not saving the Fiend.
“Sin is necessary,” Julian of Norwich was forced to see. “But all will be well,” she wrote, “and all will be well, and every kind of thing will be well.”
It is perhaps Thomas’ doubt about the same questions as Julian had that made him want to touch Jesus. The hope of forgiveness and grace, and the promise Jesus has offered that all will be well, is more than most of us would dare to hope, but we would love to hope it. We would perhaps rather die, if we were honest, than not hope it, but such hope is so hard to claim, if only because losing such hope would be so unbearable. And so Jesus calls Thomas forward, and Thomas, his fear-palsied hand defying his doubt, shows us that we can hope. He shows us, the much maligned doubter does, that it is all right to hope and, finally, to believe.
Jesus did many other signs after that, John says, but apparently, after that, they weren’t any of them worth writing down. Amen.
